Simulacrum in algorithmic social media feeds: perception of truth in the age of artificial visuality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2025.4.10Keywords:
visual content, simulacrum, algorithmic feeds, artificial visuality, dipstick, generative content, authenticity, digital media literacyAbstract
In today’s digital environment, the volume of visual imagery generated by artificial intelligence and disseminated through algorithmic social media feeds is steadily increasing. This transformation of media content raises the critical issue of shifting focus from documentary truth to emotionally plausible simulation, which significantly affects users’ cognitive perception of truth. The purpose of this study is to analyze the functioning of visual simulacra in personalized feeds and to examine their impact on the formation of perceptions of information authenticity. The methodological framework combines an interdisciplinary approach integrating J. Baudrillard’s theory of simulacra, visual semiotics, critical discourse analysis, and digital ethnography. The empirical basis consists of Facebook posts from 2024–2025 containing photorealistic images with identifiable features of artificial generation. Methods applied include visual and content analysis as well as comparative analysis of authentic and AI-generated imagery. The findings reveal that images without real-world prototypes, yet constructed according to the principle of emotional recognizability, are perceived as authentic due to narrative framing, orthographic imperfections, selective or absent use of hashtags, and aesthetic stylization. Algorithmic amplification enhances the virality of such materials while diminishing the audience’s critical vigilance. It has been proven that: 1) visual simulacra function as elements of hyperreality, replacing documentary evidence with affective reactions, especially in conditions of social tension or war; 2) the effectiveness of simulacra in the digital environment is due to their multimodal nature: the visual and verbal form a single communicative construct, where the text acts as a framework for interpretation and sets the trajectory of perception of what is depicted; 3) accompanying texts are formed according to two basic models (a character’s address to the user or a conditional narrator’s statement), each of which has a specific impact on the mechanisms of trust and emotional engagement.
The research novelty lies in integrating the concept of simulacra with the analysis of algorithmic content promotion mechanisms, providing deeper insights into the dynamics of media truth construction in the age of artificial visuality. The practical value of the study lies in identifying mechanisms of visual manipulation and developing recommendations for enhancing digital visual literacy.
Downloads
References
Bansal, S., Kumar, M., Raghaw, C. S., & Kumar, N. (2025). Sentiment and hashtag-aware attentive deep neural network for multimodal post popularity prediction. Neural Computing and Applications, 37(4), 2799–2824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10755-5
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulations. Ann Arbor, The University of Michigan Press.
Bratich, J. Z. (2008). From embedded to machinic intellectuals: Communication Studies and General intellect. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 5(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420701839163
Bucher, T. (2018). If… then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001.
Chesney, B., & Citron, D. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753–1820. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3213954
Cotter, K. (2018). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684
Crafty-X. (2025a, May 30). Tsikavo, skilky liudei pryvitaie mene pobazhaie shchastia… [I wonder how many people will congratulate me wish me happiness…] Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BcNqPF3Um
Crafty-X. (2025b, July 1). Ne hortai povz, proshu, dai 3 sekundy [Please don’t scroll past, I beg you — just give 3 seconds] Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GszcNgJHk
Crafty-X. (2025c, July 17). Tato i mama pishly y zalyshyly mene samoho. Ya duzhe za nymy sumuiu. Ya lyshe proshu yikhnie blahoslovennia, shchob u mene vse bulo dobre [Dad and mom left and left me alone. I miss them very much. I only ask for their blessing so that everything will be fine with me] Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17uUa5eSBU
Crafty-X. (2025d, July 18). Vin vriatuvav stilky liudei. A khto vriatuie yoho? [He saved so many people. But who will save him?] Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BmGZbzQwE
Danesi, M. (2024). AI-generated popular culture: A semiotic perspective. Palgrave Macmillan Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54752-2
Demydchuk, O. (2025, February 3). Zghenerovana brekhnia: yak ShI-zobrazhennia staiut zbroieiu dlia rosiiskoi propahandy u Facebook [Generated lies: How AI images become a weapon of Russian propaganda on Facebook]. Lysty do pryiateliv. https://lysty.net.ua/згенерована-брехня-як-ші-зображення-с
Egalite International (2024, October 9). Alhorytmy sotsmerezh: yak vony keruiut vashymy novynamy [Social Media Algorithms: How They Shape Your News Feed]. egaliteint.org. https://www.egaliteint.org/post/so-me-algorythms
Emery Hamilton. (2025, July 5). Ne hortai povz, proshu, dai 3 sekundy… [Please don’t scroll past, I beg you — just give 3 seconds…] Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/17ckN5Dq72
Fuchs, C. (2021). Social media: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003199182-1
God Loves You. (2025, March 3). Meni trokhy sumno, bo nikhto ne skazav dobroho slova pro moiu robotu i navit ne pryvitavsia zi mnoiu [I feel somewhat sad, as no one has acknowledged my work with a kind word or even greeted me]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1E6GsNNx4M
Han, Y., Wu, S., & Haried, P. (2025). The hidden impact of hashtags on Instagram: navigational heuristics on source trustworthiness. International journal of web based communities, 21(1–2), 155–185. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2025.145135
Hobbs, R. (2011). Digital and media literacy: Connecting culture and classroom. Corwin Press.
Institute of Mass Information. (2024, November 13). Vid pravoslavia do sekty. Yak shakhrai zamaniuiut ukraintsiv za dopomohoiu ShI-zobrazhen [From Orthodoxy to cults: How fraudsters entice Ukrainians using AI-generated images]. Detector Media. https://detector.media/infospace/article/234662/2024-11-13-vid-pravoslavya-do-sekty-yak-shakhrai-zamanyuyut-ukraintsiv-za-dopomogoyu-shi-zobrazhen
Livingstone, S. Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2019) Children’s data and privacy online: Growing up in a digital age. An evidence review. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/101283/1/Livingstone_childrens_data_and_privacy_online_evidence_review_published.pdf
Polishchuk L., & Ptitsyn A. (2020). Symuliakry u kulturnii realnosti suchasnosti [Simulacra in the Cultural Reality of Contemporary Society]. In Yu. Sabadash (Ed.), Fenomen kultury posthlobalizmu [The Phenomenon of Post-Globalism Culture] (Vol. 1, pp. 222–224). Mariupol State University. https://files.znu.edu.ua/files/Bibliobooks/Inshi67/0049368.pdf#page=223
Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Polity Press.
Rader, E., & Gray, R. (2015). Understanding user beliefs about algorithmic curation in the Facebook news feed. In B. Begole, & J. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd International conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 173–182). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702174
Sharma, A., Pujari, M., & Goel, A. (2025). The rise of AI-generated synthetic identities: A new frontier in social media. International journal of innovative research in engineering & multidisciplinary physical sciences, 13(2), 232397. https://doi.org/10.37082/IJIRMPS.v13.i2.232397
Synelnyk, I. (2025, January 8). Yak nas duriat za dopomohoiu foto, zghenerovanykh shtuchnym intelektom [How we are deceived using AI-generated photos]. PECHERA.info. https://pechera.info/news/259-iak-nas-duriat-za-dopomogoiu-foto-zgenerovanix-stucnim-intelektom.html
Westerlund, M. (2019). The emergence of deepfake technology: A review. Technology innovation management review, 9(11), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1282
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ольга Пелешок

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).