BIPOLAR NATURE OF LITERARY PARODY

Authors

  • Nataliia Vinnikova Київський університет імені Бориса Грінченка, кафедра української літератури i компаративістики

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2015.3fg98

Keywords:

parody, bipolarity, duality, the object of parody, intertextuality

Abstract

The article goes about one of the key features of the genre of parody – the duality of its structure, which is in opposition with parody style and the parody author's own style, and certainly contains a "discrepancy" of both plans and their displacement. The conclusion has been done, that literary parody is characterised by two plans - the first one (literally) and second (parody object). It is emphasized, that the lack of knowledge about the object excludes the potential effect of parody and leads to absurd parody content. The dependence of successful parody on skill to combine principal with comic, general with specific, the ability to be original in style imitation is traced.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nataliia Vinnikova, Київський університет імені Бориса Грінченка, кафедра української літератури i компаративістики

доктор філологічних наук

References

Арнольд И.В. Проблемы интертертекстуальности / И.В.Арнольд // Вестник СПб. ун-та. Серія 2. – Вып.4. – 1992. – С.53-61.

Бахтин М.М. Вопросы литературы и эстетики. Исследования разных лет / М.М.Бахтин. – М.: Худож. лит., 1975. – 504 с.

Морозов А.А. Пародия как литературный жанр (к теории пародии) / А.Морозов // Русс. лит. – 1960. – №1. – С.48-77.

Новиков В.И. Книга о пародии / Вл. Новиков. – М.: Сов. писатель, 1989. – 540 с.

Поляков М.Я. Язык пародии и проблема структуры стиля / М.Я.Поляков // Литературные направления и стили: сборник ст. – М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1976. – С.115-130.

Сарнов Б.М. Плоды изнурения (Литературная пародия вчера и сегодня) / Б.М.Сарнов // Вопр. лит. – 1984. – №11. – С.106-150.

Тынянов Ю.Н. Достоевский и Гоголь (к теории пародии) / Ю.Н.Тынянов // Тынянов Ю.Н. Поэтика. История литературы. Кино. – М.: Наука, 1977. – С.198-226.

Фишер В. Пародия в творчестве Пушкина / В.Фишер // Русский библиофил. – 1916. – №6. – С.84-89.

Эйзенштейн С.М. Избранные произведения: в 6 т. / С.М.Эйзенштейн; [глав. ред. С.Н.Юткевич]. – Т.3 / сост. П.М.Аташева, Н.И.Клейман, Л.К.Козлов. – М.: Искусство, 1964. – 671 с.

Ямпольский М. Память Тиресия. Интертекстуальность и кинематограф / М.Ямпольский. – М.: РИК “Культура”, 1993. – 464 с.

Genette G. Palimpsestes: La littereture au second degre / Gérard Genette. – Paris: Seuil, 1982. – 576 p.

Holthuis S. Intertextualitaet. Aspekte einer rezepzionsorientierten Konzepzion / S.Holthuis. – Tuebingen: Stauffenburg Verlag Brigitte Narr GmbH, 1993. – 270 s.

Downloads


Abstract views: 358

Published

15.11.2015

How to Cite

Vinnikova, N. (2015). BIPOLAR NATURE OF LITERARY PARODY. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, (3(11). https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2015.3fg98

Issue

No. 3(11) (2015)

Section

Theoretical horizons of Literary Studies

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).