HISTORICAL PARADIGM OF SEMIOTICS

Authors

  • Inha Pogrebniak Київський університет імені Бориса Грінченка, кафедра української літератури і компаративістики

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259X.2017(2)8122

Keywords:

semiotics, sign, semasiology, sign process, paradigm

Abstract

The article analyses the theoretical basis and development trends of the semiotics in literary critics. It characterizes the scope of definitions of semiotics as the science about the semiotic system, common characteristics of semiotic systems, general theories of signs and systems. It is noted that because of semiotics popularity people not always engage research activities in this realm correctly, and there is excess use of its terms, which arouse concern among scientists. The article outlines the genesis of the sign theory itself, defines timeline and specificity of semiotics as a science, and designates its establishers, whose researches define the polarity in the approach to semiotics. It considers the primary gazes of the representatives’ of variant critical currents which had become a subject of strong support from ones and intense critics from others. The attention is focused on the researches of the 1950–1990’s in XX century by both national and foreign authors, which outline the topics of usage of the structural and semiotic methods in the study of literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Inha Pogrebniak, Київський університет імені Бориса Грінченка, кафедра української літератури і компаративістики

кандидат філологічних наук

References

REFERENCES (TRANSLITERATED)

Deely J. The Impact of Semiotics to Philosophy. Helsinki, 2000. – Р. 23. – (In English).

Encyclopedic dictionary of semiotics / Gen. ed. T.Sebeok. – In 3 vol. – Vol.1: A – M. – Vol.2: N – Z. – Vol.3: Bibliography. – Berlin, etc.: Mouton De Gruyter, cop. 1986. – 592 p., 593 p., 452 p. – (In English).

Hawkes T. Structuralism and semiotics. – London, Berkeley: University of California press, 1977. – 192 p. – (In English).

Ryder M. Semiotics: Language and Culture. In: Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics. Copyright © 2001–2006 by Macmillan Reference USA, an imprint of the Gale Group. – (In English).

Avgustin A. O Troice: v pjatnadcati knigah protiv arian. Krasnodar: Glagol, 2004. – p. 363. – (In Russian).

Aristotel. Ob istolkovanii, 16a3-5 // Aristotel. Sochinenija v chetyreh tomah. Vol.2. Moskva: Mysl, 1978. – p. 252. – (In Russian).

Lokk Dzh. Opyt o chelovecheskom razume. Vol. 1. Moskva: Socjegiz, 1960. – p. 695. – (In Russian).

Novaja filosofskaja jenciklopedija. V chetyreh tomah. / In-t filosofii RAN. Nauchno-red. sovet: V.S. Stepin, A.A. Gusejnov, G.Ju. Semigin. M., Mysl, 2010, Vol. II, E – M,. – p. 613. – (In Russian).

Sekst Je. Sochinenija v dvuh tomah. Vol.1. Moskva: Mysl, 1976. – pp. 179–280. – (In Russian).

Skripnik K.D. Semiotika: glossarij kljuchevyh terminov. Rostov n/D, 2010. – p. 150. – (In Russian).

Sosjur F. de Trudy po jazykoznaniju. Moskva: Progress, 1977. – p. 54. – (In Russian).

Jakobson R. Semiotika. Moskva: Raduga, 1983. – p. 102. – (In Russian).

Downloads


Abstract views: 515

Published

30.06.2017

How to Cite

Pogrebniak, I. (2017). HISTORICAL PARADIGM OF SEMIOTICS. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, (2(18), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259X.2017(2)8122

Issue

Section

Theoretical horizons of Literary Studies