The intellectual's artistic biography in S. Rosovetskyi's dramatic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2020.1.1

Keywords:

artistic biography, drama, personal biography, intellectual drama, antropologization of ideas, meta-genre

Abstract

The global trend of digitalization and publishing of historical sources, in particular fiction and its existence in different eras, makes the reader constantly reconsider the lives and work of persons who are regarded as prototypes of characters in literary works. As a result, an artistic image, linked to real life and rooted in the past, generates a consistent literary story in the form of artistic biography. The number and variety of such literary works, including dramatic ones, is constantly growing, which determines the topicality of this study. Over the recent decades, biographical fiction drastically changed its forms, and was enriched with numerous genre varieties and modifications. And this process remains far from complete. The term ‘meta-genre of artistic biography’ is introduced to designate it. This term emphasizes the scale of a certain phenomenon and allows defining the subject of the study — the artistic biographical description of the intellectual in contemporary Ukrainian drama — as well as clarify the understanding of the concept of the ‘intellectual,’ and problematize ways of describing characters of this type. The purpose of the article is to identify the genre-style unity of Ukraine’s modern drama about intellectuals and prove the expediency of the application to it of interpretive approaches to popular knowledge from related areas (history, philosophy, art). Specifically, such varieties of genres as personal artistic biography and intellectual artistic biography were singled out and proposed for the first time on the literary material (S. Rosovetskyi), and that is the research novelty. The research methodology is defined by an interdisciplinary approach that appeals to the achievements of literary criticism, art criticism, history, and philosophy. Results of the Study are connected with considerations that the interest in the artistic biography of the intellectual is associated with a general trend to anthropologize scientific knowledge, coupled with the growing interest of the audience in the individual and personal in the history and in the present, with the dominance of the emotional component in contemporary media discourses, resulting in the actualization of an emotional narrative of the intellectual’s biography, which often sounds tragic nowadays in the context of the catastrophic past of the Ukrainian science and culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mariana Shapoval, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Institute of Philology

Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of History of Ukrainian Literature, Theory of Literature and Literary Creativity

References

Andrieiev, V. (2005). “Indyvidualna istoriia” yak shliakh do samorefleksii v postmodernistskykh praktykakh istorychnoi nauky. [“Individual history” as a way to self-reflection in the postmodern practices of historical science]. Eidos. Almanakh teorii ta istorii istorychnoi nauky [Eidos. Historiographic Almanac], 1, 206–226.

Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [Philosophical Encyclopaedic Dictionary] (2002). Kyiv: Abrys.

Jauss, H. R. (2011). Dosvid estetychnoho spryiniattia i literaturna hermenevtyka [Experience of aesthetic perception and literary hermeneutics]. Kyiv: Osnovy.

Kolesnyk, I. (2005). Kulturno-intelektualna istoriia yak dzerkalo “novoi naukovoi revoliutsii” [Cultural and intellectual history as a mirror of the “new scientific revolution”]. Eidos. Almanakh teorii ta istorii istorychnoi nauky [Eidos. Historigraphic Almanac], 1, 36–45.

Marinesko, V. (2012). Literaturna biohrafiia yak zhanrova model: osoblyvosti evoliutsii, atrybutyvni ta modusni oznaky [Literary biography as a genre model: peculiarities of evolution, attribute and modus features]. Naukovi praczi Chornomorskogo derzhavnogo universitetu imeni Petra Mogili kompleksu “Kiyevo-Mogilyanska akademiya”, 193(181), 59–63.

Menzhulin, V. (2010). Biohrafichnyi pidkhid v istoryko-filosofskomu piznanni [Biographical approach in historical and philosophical knowledge]. Kyiv: NaUKMA; AgrarMediaGroup.

Nemchynov, I. (2019). Suchasni pidkhody do biohrafichnykh doslidzhen: mikronaratyv vs metanaratyv [Modern approaches to biographical research: micronarrative vs metanarrative]. Treti akademichni chytannia pamiati profesora H. I. Volynky: “Filosofiia, nauka i osvita” (pp. 123–125). Кyiv: VADEKS.

Popova, T. (2012). Personal'naja istorija VS intellektual'naja biografija, bioistoriografija: podhody i ponjatija [Personal history VS intellectual biography, biohistoriography: approaches and concepts]. In Chelovek v istorii i kul'ture : Memorial'nyj sbornik materialov i issledovanij v pamjat' V. N. Stanko, Vol. 2 (pp. 540–563). Odesa: Smil.

Rosovetsky, S. (2016). Piesy pro pysmennykiv [Plays about writers]. Kyiv, Selena.

Vashchenko, V. (2009a). Kontsept “intelektualna biohrafiia” ta konstruiuvannia “naukovykh biohrafii” v ukrainskii istoriohrafii [The concept of the “intellectual biography” and construction of “scientific biographies” in Ukrainian historiography]. Eidos. Almanakh teorii ta istorii istorychnoi nauky [Eidos. Historigraphic Almanac], 4, 206–226.

Vashchenko, V. (2009b). Stratehii konstruiuvannia M. Hrushevskym ukrainskykh metanaratyviv: metody ta yikh funktsii [The strategies of construction of the Ukrainian metanarratives by M. Hroushevskyi: methods and their functions]. (Extended abstract of Doctoral dissertation, Historiography, Source Studies and Special Historical Disciplines, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Dnipro, Ukraine).

Yevropeiskyi slovnyk filosofii: Leksykon neperekladnostei (2011). [European Dictionary of Philosophy: A Lexicon of Untranslatables], Vol. 2, Kyiv: Dukh i litera.

Downloads


Abstract views: 526

Published

31.03.2020

How to Cite

Shapoval, M. (2020). The intellectual’s artistic biography in S. Rosovetskyi’s dramatic. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, 26(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2020.1.1

Issue

Section

Theoretical horizons of Literary Studies