Father-child discourse in <em>Family Guy</em>: a corpus-based analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2020.2.6

Keywords:

corpus-based analysis, father-child discourse, animated series, gender stereotypes, family stereotypes

Abstract

The article aims at analysis of gender and family stereotypes in father-child communication in an animated series Family Guy, featuring a typical American family. The study focuses on Peter Griffin's discourse, the father of the family, containing his communication with two of his teenage children, a son and a daughter, unveiling gender peculiarities in father-son and  father-daughter discourses. The attempt is made to disclose how gender and family roles are verbalized in communication between family members. The conversation, discourse and corpus-based analyses have been used to analyze the main character's discourse in order to single out the father's specific vocabulary — through word lists, keyword lists, clusters and collocations — he uses while communicating with his son and daughter. The findings show that Peter Griffin chooses different language means while talking to his son and daughter. Thus, his discourse addressing his adolescent son Chris is rich in direct addresses, mainly commands when the father tries to discipline his son. Offering his son emotional support or encouragement the father stays forthright with him creating an image of “real men” stereotypical conversations. On the contrary, while communicating with his daughter Peter modifies her name Meg addressing her as honey, sweetheart, one-of-a-kind in father-daughter discourse. However, using diminutives he humiliates his daughter and makes her feel an abandoned child. In this way, he makes her feel special but in a negative way. Family communication created in the animated series reflects gender stereotypes in father's attitude to his children belonging to two different sexes. Nevertheless, this verbal tendency does not affect relationships within the family. For the future, it is worthwhile to compile a larger corpus including mother-child, child-father, and child-mother discourses to get more representative results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baker, P. (2013). Introduction: Virtual special issue of Gender and Language on corpus approaches. Gender And Language, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1558/8psxqda5wh3d.

Bestiuk, I. (2011). Idiolect — language of an individual. https://er.nau.edu.ua/bitstream/NAU/9826/1/Idiolect+%e2%80%93+language+of+an+individual.Pdf.

Bukholts, N. (2016). Vidtvorennia idiolektu personazhiv animatsiinykh filmiv u perekladi [Reproduction of idiolect in the translation of animated films] (PhD thesis, Kherson State University).

Family Guy. Created by Seth MacFarlane. FOX Television Network, 1998–2001, 2005.

Death Has a Shadow (1ACX01) Season 1, episode 1, aired 20 December January 1998.

I Never Met the Dead Man (1ACX02) Season 1, episode 2, aired 11 April 1999.

Chitty Chitty Death Bang (1ACX03) Season 1, episode 3, aired 18 April 1999.

The Son Also Draws (1ACX06) Season 1, episode 6, aired 9 May 1999.

He's Too Sexy for His Fat (2ACX17) Season 2, episode 17, aired 27 June 2000.

Peter Griffin Husband Father Brother (3ACX14) Season 3, episode 14, aired 6 December 2001.

Don't Make Me Over (4ACX4) Season 4, episode 4, aired 5 June 2005.

Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773

Kübler, S., Zinsmeister, H. (2015). Corpus linguistics and linguistically annotated corpora. Bloomsbury.

Leech, G., Fallon, R. (1992). Computer corpora: what do they tell us about culture. ICAME Journal, 16, 29–51.

Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. Directions in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 105–122). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

McEnery, T., Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395.

McEnery, T., Wilson, A., (2001). Corpus linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Quirk, R. (1960). Towards a description of English usage. The Philological Society (pp. 40–61). London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1960.tb00308.x.

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus Concordance Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of language, 2(1), 23–55. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu.

Tkachyk, O. (2018). Vykorystannia korpusnykh metodiv u hendernykh doslidzhenniakh [Using corpus methods to analyze gender]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». «Filolohiia», 1(69), 2, 194–196. https://doi.org/10.25264/2519-2558-2018-1(69)/2-194-196.

Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6.

Viana, V., Zyngier, S. & Barnbrook, G. (Eds.). (2011). Perspectives on Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.48.

Downloads


Abstract views: 572

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Sliepushova, A. (2020). Father-child discourse in <em>Family Guy</em>: a corpus-based analysis. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, 26(2), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2020.2.6

Issue

Section

Linguistic analysis of artistic text