Semantic contrast and inequality in the vocative position (based on English fiction)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2020.2.7

Keywords:

semantic contrast and inequality, literary text, vocatives, evaluative component, context

Abstract

 This paper aims at analysis of stylistic devices based on semantic contrast and inequality actualized in the vocative position. The subject of the study is functioning of the given vocatives in literary texts. The author used methods of semantic, contextual analysis and elements of pragmatic analysis. The results of the study. Ironic forms of address were firstly analysed among contrastive vocatives. They often include evaluative component of connotation. Depending on the context this component of connotation may change its meaning from negative to positive and vice versa.  Cases of non-referential use of address forms for creating ironic meaning are also discussed. During the analysis of address forms based on oxymoron certain postulates of M. V. Nikitin's theory of semantic combinatorics are used. The findings indicate that contradictory relations may exist not only inside a vocative syntagm, but also between the vocative and the rest of the utterance. In addition to that, semantic and stylistic types of such contradictoriness are characterized. Moreover, types of gradation and frequency of their actualization in the vocative position are analyzed. Besides that, variants of gradation components positioning in the text are revealed. The role of authorial text in the adequate interpretation of emotional and evaluative address forms — components of gradation — is defined. The usage of all of the above mentioned stylistic devices in the vocative position is combined with the evaluative component of connotation, highlighting positive or negative attitude of the speaker to the addressee and certain reaction of the speaker to the concrete communicative situation, addressee's words or behaviour. Further study of address forms may be promising in their interrelation with other means expressing the category of speech addressability, in revealing their genre specificity and characteristic features of other stylistic devices actualization in the vocative position.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Iryna Tryshchenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Institute of Philology

PhD in Philology, MA in Language Studies of  Lancaster University (UK), Associate Professor of Department of English Translation Theory and Practice

References

Arnold, I. (2002). Stilistika. Sovremennyi angliyskiy yazyk [Stylistics. Modern English Language]. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka.

Braine, J. (2002). Room at the Top. London: Arrow.

Christie, A. (1978). The Man in the Brown Suit. Frogmore: Triad Panther.

Coward, N. (1979). Plays: One. London: Eyre Methuen.

Francis, D. (2000). Nerve. London, Sydney: Pan Books.

Galperin, I. (2010). Stilistika angliyskogo yazyka [Stylistics of the English Language]. Moscow: Librokom.

Hailey, A. (1986). Strong Medicine. New York: Dell Publishing.

Maugham, W. S. (1974). Three Comedies. New York: Washington Square Press.

Nikitin, M. (2007). Kurs lingvisticheskoi semantiki [Course in Linguistic Semantics]. Saint-Petersburg: RGPU named after Herzen.

Pocheptsov, G. jr. (1987) Kommunikativnyje aspekty semantiki [Communicative Aspects of Semantics]. Kyiv: KGU.

Pokhodnya, S. (1984). Yazykovyie sredstva vyrazheniya ironii v angloyazychnoi khudozhestvennoi prose [Linguistic Means of Expressing Irony in English Literary Prose]. (Abstract of PhD thesis). Kyiv.

Saroyan, W. (1975). Selected Short Stories. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Segal, E. (1981). Man, Woman and Child. Frogmore: Granada Publishing.

Shaw, J. B. (1989). Heartbreak House. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Updike, J. (1987). Of the Farm. Moscow: Raduga Publishers.

Downloads


Abstract views: 312

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Tryshchenko, I. (2020). Semantic contrast and inequality in the vocative position (based on English fiction). Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, 26(2), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2020.2.7

Issue

Section

Linguistic analysis of artistic text