Emotion concepts for representing the vicissitudes of fate in Markus Zusak’s “Bridge of Clay”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2022.1.3

Keywords:

literary text, reality, mental world, expressiveness, narrative

Abstract

The problem of studying emotionally expressive information contained in a text is of considerable interest since it interprets reality, expressing value or emotionally significant attitudes toward this reality. The analysis of the emotivity and expressiveness of a literary text focuses primarily on its research from the cognitive (separation of emotiogenic knowledge) and semantic (determining the features of its use to indicate the author’s purposes) perspectives. A literary text is considered as a dual dimension: on the one hand, it is related to emotions, and on the other hand, it is specified by them. The aim of the article is to identify and examine the emotional concepts represented in Markus Zusak’s Bridge of Clay for portraying the vicissitudes of fate. The breath-taking story revolves around the Dunbar family of ‘ramshackle tragedy’ and brims with pathos. To analyse the emotion concepts, the following methods have been employed: the methods of interpretation and systematisation; contextual, stylistic, and distributive analysis as also a method of emotional valence, and the hypothetico-deductive method. The Results of the Study show that emotion concepts in Zusak’s Bridge of Clay are realised at the following levels: phonetics, morphology, and semantics, which shows the universality of functioning emotion concepts in fictional discourse. The emotion concept appears as a single entity that consists of attributes of emotivity, which are anthropocentric and character-creating. The lexical units, chosen by Zusak, convey the author’s intentions, explicitly or implicitly indicating the emotional nature of the text. Since characters belong to the category of essential universals of a literary text, the emotional meanings included in its structure have a special informative significance. The character’s emotions are represented as the special psychological reality, and the set of emotions in the text appears as a kind of dynamic plurality that changes as the story develops.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrii Bezrukov, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at Philology and Translation Department

Oksana Bohovyk, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies

PhD in Philology, Assistant Professor at Philology and Translation Department

References

Adolphs, R. (2016). How should neuroscience study emotions? By distinguishing emotion states, concepts, and experiences. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw153

Bamberg, M. (1997). Language, concepts and emotions: The role of language in the construction of emotions. Language Sciences, 19(4), 309–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(97)00004-1

Bezrukov, A., & Bohovyk, O. (2021). Creating communicative space and textual reality via emotiogenic means in fictional discourse. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v13n1.21

Dijkstra, K., Zwaan, R. A., Graesser, A. C., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Character and reader emotions in literary texts. Poetics, 23(1–2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)00009-u

Galasinski, D. (2004). Men and the language of emotions. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510128

Groves, A. J., & Smith, W. T. (2019). Untangling emotions. Crossway.

Kim, S. (2010). The rationality of emotion toward fiction. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 34(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2010.00203.x

Maia, B., & Santos, D. (2018). Language, emotion, and the emotions: The multidisciplinary and linguistic background. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(6), e12280. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12280

Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Djikic, M., & Mullin, J. (2011). Emotion and narrative fiction: Interactive influences before, during, and after reading. Cognition & Emotion, 25(5), 818–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.515151

Meskin, A. (2003). Emotions, fiction, and cognitive architecture. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 43(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.1.18

Nelson, B. (2007). The emotion code. Wellness Unmasked Publishing.

Oatley, K. (2013). Emotions and the story worlds of fiction. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.). Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 39–70). Psychology Press.

Phillips, J. (2000). Two theories of fictional discourse. American Philosophical Quarterly, 37(2), 107–119.

Predelli, S. (2020). Fictional discourse: A radical fictionalist semantics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854128.001.0001

Sebag-Montefiore, C. (2019, October 21). Markus Zusak on how Bridge of Clay left him “beaten up and bruised.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/dec/17/markus-zusak-on-how-bridge-of-clay-left-him-beaten-up-and-bruised

Sias, J., & Bar-On, D. (2016). Emotions and their expressions. In C. Abell & J. Smith (Eds.), The Expression of emotion: Philosophical, psychological and legal perspectives (pp. 46–72). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316275672.003

Stamou, A. G. (2018). Sociolinguistics of fiction. Discourse, Context & Media, 23, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.003

Wildgen, W. (2004). The evolution of human language: Scenarios, principles, and cultural dynamics. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.57

Winkielman, P., Coulson, S., & Niedenthal, P. (2018). Dynamic grounding of emotion concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170127. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0127

Yanal, R. J. (1999). Paradoxes of emotion and fiction. Penn State University Press.

Zusak, M. (2019). Bridge of Clay. Black Swan.

Downloads


Abstract views: 263

Published

28.04.2022

How to Cite

Bezrukov, A., & Bohovyk, O. (2022). Emotion concepts for representing the vicissitudes of fate in Markus Zusak’s “Bridge of Clay”. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, 28(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2022.1.3

Issue

Section

Practices of literary text interpretation