Key newsmakers’ appearance dynamics in Ukrainian online mass-media news before and after the full-scale Russian invasion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2022.4.6Keywords:
newsmaker, online mass media, media environment, news, a full-scale invasionAbstract
The subject of the study is the dynamics of the presence of key newsmakers in the news of the leading independent online media in Ukraine in order to understand the features of the digital media environment and the specifics of its transformation during the full-scale invasion. The development of modern media is caused by the “hybrid media system” (Chadwick, 2013). Under the influence of digitalization, social networks, and new media, mass media have been changing. The media are no longer the first to produce news, their dependence on the government and leaders’ opinions is increasing, and instead the government can communicate with society without media. In addition, the amount of attention that audiences are willing to pay to news is decreasing, and mass media is no longer addressing the mass audience, but rather different audiences, which in the digital environment discuss their own interests and needs. However, the peculiarities of the media environment in the times of the full-scale invasion have not been studied yet. The purpose of the research is to analyse the dynamics of the presence of key newsmakers in online mass media and to identify the features of the transformation of the Ukrainian digital media environment during the full-scale invasion by the Russian Federation. The research methodology provides an automated algorithm for monitoring content in media (Python programming language). The object of the study is the headlines of the leading quality Ukrainian media: “Ukrainska Pravda” (50200 headlines) and “Dzerkalo Tyzhnia” (41328) for October 2021 — October 2022.
As the result of the study, it was established that before the full-scale invasion there were practically no permanent popular newsmakers, which would be ready to generate messages for mass media. Mainly the media covered “covid” and the statements of the newsmakers about it. After February 24, in the first period, Zelenskyi appeared in the spotlight, and his popularity increased significantly. Other official sources appeared as well: the General Staff and the regional administrations — to control the agenda both at the national and regional levels. Over time attention to Zelenskyi decreased and the need for war analytics was observed. Along with official sources, there was also a single independent one. The perspective of the research is to compare the presence of key newsmakers in online media and social media.
Downloads
References
Bennett, L., Breunig, C., & Givens, T. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the U.S. Political Communication, 25(3), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802197434
Blassnig, S., Ernst, N., Buchel, F., Engesser, S., & Esser, F. (2019). Populism in online election coverage. Journalism Studies, 20(8), 1110–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1487802
Broersma, M., & Graham, T. S. (2013). Twitter as a news source: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007–2011. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802481
Chadwick, A. (2011). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British Prime Minister and the “Bullygate” affair. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210384730
Davis, R., Baumgartner, J., Francia, P., & Morris, J. (2009). The internet in U.S. election campaigns. In A. Chadwick, & P. Howard (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics (pp. 13–24). Routledge.
Dhavan, S., Friedland, L., Wells, C., Kim, Y., & Rojas, H. (2012). Communication, consumers, and citizens: Revisiting the politics of consumption. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212456349
Ernst, N., Esser, F., Blassnig, S., & Engesser, S. (2019). Favorable opportunity structures for populist communication: Comparing different types of politicians and issues in social media, television and the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 24(2), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218819430
Genovese, F. (2019). International Crises and Political Patterns of Papal Tweets. Political Science & Politics, 52(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518001087
Goldhaber, M. (1997). The attention economy and the net. First Mind. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i4.519
Gustafsson, N. (2010). This time it’s personal: social networks, viral politics and identity management. In D. Riha, A. & Rodopi (Eds.). Emerging practices in cyberculture and social networking (pp. 3–24). Brill.
IMI. (2021, September 29). Bilyi spysok: 10 media, shcho staly naiiakisnishymy [Whitelist: 10 media that became the highest quality]. IMI. https://imi.org.ua/monitorings/bilyj-spysok-10-media-shho-staly-najyakisnishymy-i41541
Internews. (2022, November). Ukrainski media, stavlennia ta dovira u 2022 r. []. Internews. https://internews.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Ukrainski-media-stavlennia-ta-dovira-2022.pdf
López-Rabadán, P., & Mellado, C. (2019). Twitter as a space for interaction in political journalism. Dynamics, consequences and proposal of interactivity scale for social media. Communication & Society, 32(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.1-18
Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472
Richards, B. (2011). The Twitter effect: Social media and the news. Balancing profitability and sustainability: Shaping the future of business, 18(2), 618–624.
Schroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the internet media, technology and globalization. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20krxdr
Thompson, J. (2005). The new visibility. Theory Culture & Society, 22(6), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405059413
Villar, S., & María, J. (2019). The use of blogs as social media tools of political communication: citizen journalism and public opinion 2.0. Communication & Society, 32(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.39-55
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nataliia Steblyna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
