Ways of nominating the enemy in media texts
Ukrainian and Polish documentary films and Ukrainian feature films and mass media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2024.4.8Keywords:
hate speech, media content, documentary, feature filmAbstract
The article presents the analysis of language units to denote an enemy used in media content of different genres: official media reports, documentaries and feature films. The relevance of the study is determined by the urgent need to study the peculiarities of linguistic film discourses in the media in general and cinema as a special type of media content. The subject of the research is the linguistic forms of naming the enemy in Ukrainian documentary and feature films during the period of the full-scale invasion and the use of similar forms in media texts to determine the peculiarities of the correlation between different media genres. The researcher set the goal of describing the linguistic forms used to name the enemy and to trace their correlation in various media genres. The following methods were used to achieve this goal: content analysis, comparative analysis, semantic analysis, context analysis.
The results of the study prove that the words with the attribute of hate speech that contain an intention of humiliation, disrespect, etc., are a special linguistic strategy which becomes leading for media during the period of the armed confrontation. Similarity in narratives and nominations proves the formation of a common speech discourse for the media content different in nature. Among the most widely-spread denominations one can determine: “rusnia”, “katsap / katsapnia”, “rusсists”, “moskals”, “orks”, “nechyst”, the use of such notions as “Russian world”, “liberators” marked by propaganda and used ironically and derogatorily also draw attention.
Such denominations are a manifestation of the language of enmity, which is usually perceived as an undesirable manifestation of mental intolerance, however, in times of war, the formation of a whole layer of such denominations appears as a manifestation of resistance, ideological opposition to the enemy, a psychological mechanism of its dehumanization against the background of a heightened perception of one’s identity in the face of a threat.
Downloads
References
Anusiewicz, J., Dąbrowska, A., & Fleischer, M. (2000). Językowy obraz świata i kultura. Projekt koncepcji badawczej [Linguistic image of the world and culture. Research concept project]. Język a kultura, 13(2), 11–44.
Baran, M. (2015). Nienawiść jako narzędzie wojny [Hate as a weapon of war]. In J. M. Byrska & J. Synowiec (Eds.), Nienawiść w życiu publicznym (pp. 135–151). Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie Wydawnictwo Naukowe. https://doi.org/10.15633/9788374384896.09
Bazin, A. (1963). Na marginesie Dlaczego walczymy [On the sidelines ‘Why We Fight’]. In B. Michałek (Trans. & Ed.), Film i rzeczywistość. Wydawnictwa Artystyczne i Filmowe.
Czachur, W. (2011). Dyskursywny obraz świata. Kilka refleksji [Discursive image of the world. Some reflections]. Tekst i Dyskurs – Text und Diskurs, 4, 79–97.
Hučkova, J. (2023). Użyteczny wróg. Кonflikty wojenne w filmie dokumentalnym na wybranych przykładach [A Useful Enemy: Military Conflicts in Documentary Films on Selected Examples]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio F. Historia, 78, 189–211, https://doi.org/10.17951/f.2023.78.189-211.
Kuleshir, M. (2023). The Reflection of the russo-ukrainian war in the lexical level of the Ukrainian language. In Philological sciences and translation studies: European potential (pp. 11–15). Publishing House “Baltija Publishing”. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-348-4-2
Kurianyk, I. (2013). Zvidky pokhodyt slovo “khokhol” [Where does the word “khokhol” come from?]. dynamo.kiev.ua. https://dynamo.kiev.ua/blog/149981-zvdki-pohodit-slovo-hohol
Lippman, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Łódzki, B. (2017). Medialny obraz rzeczywistości [Media image of reality]. Studia Socialia Cracoviensia, 9(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.15633/ssc.2305
Osipova, Z. (2023). Humor as a survival strategy in the conditions of sociocultural trauma of the Russian invasion to Ukraine. The scientific journal of Cahul State University “BP Hasdeu”: Social Sciences, 17(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8215826.
Plisiecki, J. (2010). Język filmu i jego mowa [The language of film and its speech]. Roczniki Kulturoznawcze, 1, 163–174.
Skliar, O. (2022). Invektyva i viina [Invective and war]. International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology, 57, 71–74. https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2022.57.18
Yakymovych-Chapran, D. (2020). Etnonim moskal yak komponent ukrainskykh frazem i paremii: linhvokulturnyi aspekt [Ethnonym moskal as a component of Ukrainian phrases and paremies: a lingvocultural aspect]. Visnyk of Lviv University. Series Philology, 72, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.30970/vpl.2020.72.10922
Yas, O. (2023). Rosiia yak Mordor: fenteziini aliuzii u suchasnykh voiennykh naratyvakh [Russia as Mordor: fantasy allusions in contemporary war narratives]. Ukrainian historical journal, 5, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2023.05.005
Yekelchyk, S. (2022). Naming the war: Russian aggression in Ukrainian official discourse and mass culture. Canadian slavonic papers, 64(2–3), 232–246, https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2022.2106688
Zwierzchowski, P. (2011), “Jak być kochaną” i “Szyfry” — wojna, pamięć i kino polskie lat 60 [“How to Be Loved” and “Cyphers” — War, Memory and Polish Cinema of the 1960s]. In M. Jakubowskа, K. Żyto, & A. M. Zarychtа (Eds.). Filmowe ogrody Wojciecha Jerzego Hasa (pp. 74–86). PWSFTviT.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Olena Rosinska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).