Ways of nominating the enemy in media texts

Ukrainian and Polish documentary films and Ukrainian feature films and mass media

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2024.4.8

Keywords:

hate speech, media content, documentary, feature film

Abstract

The article presents the analysis of language units to denote an enemy used in media content of different genres: official media reports, documentaries and feature films. The relevance of the study is determined by the urgent need to study the peculiarities of linguistic film discourses in the media in general and cinema as a special type of media content. The subject of the research is the linguistic forms of naming the enemy in Ukrainian documentary and feature films during the period of the full-scale invasion and the use of similar forms in media texts to determine the peculiarities of the correlation between different media genres. The researcher set the goal of describing the linguistic forms used to name the enemy and to trace their correlation in various media genres. The following methods were used to achieve this goal: content analysis, comparative analysis, semantic analysis, context analysis.

The results of the study prove that the words with the attribute of hate speech that contain an intention of humiliation, disrespect, etc., are a special linguistic strategy which becomes leading for media during the period of the armed confrontation. Similarity in narratives and nominations proves the formation of a common speech discourse for the media content different in nature. Among the most widely-spread denominations one can determine: “rusnia”, “katsap / katsapnia”, “rusсists”, “moskals”, “orks”, “nechyst”, the use of such notions as “Russian world”, “liberators” marked by propaganda and used ironically and derogatorily also draw attention.

Such denominations are a manifestation of the language of enmity, which is usually perceived as an undesirable manifestation of mental intolerance, however, in times of war, the formation of a whole layer of such denominations appears as a manifestation of resistance, ideological opposition to the enemy, a psychological mechanism of its dehumanization against the background of a heightened perception of one’s identity in the face of a threat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Olena Rosinska, Kyiv National University of Economics named after Vadym Hetman

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Sociology Department

References

Anusiewicz, J., Dąbrowska, A., & Fleischer, M. (2000). Językowy obraz świata i kultura. Projekt koncepcji badawczej [Linguistic image of the world and culture. Research concept project]. Język a kultura, 13(2), 11–44.

Baran, M. (2015). Nienawiść jako narzędzie wojny [Hate as a weapon of war]. In J. M. Byrska & J. Synowiec (Eds.), Nienawiść w życiu publicznym (pp. 135–151). Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie Wydawnictwo Naukowe. https://doi.org/10.15633/9788374384896.09

Bazin, A. (1963). Na marginesie Dlaczego walczymy [On the sidelines ‘Why We Fight’]. In B. Michałek (Trans. & Ed.), Film i rzeczywistość. Wydawnictwa Artystyczne i Filmowe.

Czachur, W. (2011). Dyskursywny obraz świata. Kilka refleksji [Discursive image of the world. Some reflections]. Tekst i Dyskurs – Text und Diskurs, 4, 79­–97.

Hučkova, J. (2023). Użyteczny wróg. Кonflikty wojenne w filmie dokumentalnym na wybranych przykładach [A Useful Enemy: Military Conflicts in Documentary Films on Selected Examples]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio F. Historia, 78, 189–211, https://doi.org/10.17951/f.2023.78.189-211.

Kuleshir, M. (2023). The Reflection of the russo-ukrainian war in the lexical level of the Ukrainian language. In Philological sciences and translation studies: European potential (pp. 11–15). Publishing House “Baltija Publishing”. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-348-4-2

Kurianyk, I. (2013). Zvidky pokhodyt slovo “khokhol” [Where does the word “khokhol” come from?]. dynamo.kiev.ua. https://dynamo.kiev.ua/blog/149981-zvdki-pohodit-slovo-hohol

Lippman, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace & Co.

Łódzki, B. (2017). Medialny obraz rzeczywistości [Media image of reality]. Studia Socialia Cracoviensia, 9(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.15633/ssc.2305

Osipova, Z. (2023). Humor as a survival strategy in the conditions of sociocultural trauma of the Russian invasion to Ukraine. The scientific journal of Cahul State University “BP Hasdeu”: Social Sciences, 17(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8215826.

Plisiecki, J. (2010). Język filmu i jego mowa [The language of film and its speech]. Roczniki Kulturoznawcze, 1, 163–174.

Skliar, O. (2022). Invektyva i viina [Invective and war]. International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology, 57, 71–74. https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2022.57.18

Yakymovych-Chapran, D. (2020). Etnonim moskal yak komponent ukrainskykh frazem i paremii: linhvokulturnyi aspekt [Ethnonym moskal as a component of Ukrainian phrases and paremies: a lingvocultural aspect]. Visnyk of Lviv University. Series Philology, 72, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.30970/vpl.2020.72.10922

Yas, O. (2023). Rosiia yak Mordor: fenteziini aliuzii u suchasnykh voiennykh naratyvakh [Russia as Mordor: fantasy allusions in contemporary war narratives]. Ukrainian historical journal, 5, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2023.05.005

Yekelchyk, S. (2022). Naming the war: Russian aggression in Ukrainian official discourse and mass culture. Canadian slavonic papers, 64(2–3), 232–246, https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2022.2106688

Zwierzchowski, P. (2011), “Jak być kochaną” i “Szyfry” — wojna, pamięć i kino polskie lat 60 [“How to Be Loved” and “Cyphers” — War, Memory and Polish Cinema of the 1960s]. In M. Jakubowskа, K. Żyto, & A. M. Zarychtа (Eds.). Filmowe ogrody Wojciecha Jerzego Hasa (pp. 74–86). PWSFTviT.

Downloads


Abstract views: 38

Published

25.12.2024

How to Cite

Rosinska, O. (2024). Ways of nominating the enemy in media texts: Ukrainian and Polish documentary films and Ukrainian feature films and mass media. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, 30(4), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2024.4.8

Issue

Section

Media and virtual reality