The modeling methodology of the world’s fractal poetical model in the British poetry of the XIX–XXI centuries (linguistic and cognitive aspects)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2018.4.6Keywords:
the poetic model of the world, conceptual tropes, concept, fractal, the fractal poetic model of the worldAbstract
The aim of the article is to explore an embodiment of reality in the world’s fractal poetic picture in the British poetry of the XIX–XXI centuries by means of the linguistic and poetic analysis of tropes as the way to actualize cognitive processes of the world picture formation. The cognitive style of the British romantic, modern and post-modern poets is investigated by means of linguistic, poetic, cognitive, mathematic, political and synergy analysis. From the standpoint of cognitive linguistics and cognitive poetics, poetic text is analysed as the result of the poet's cognition and his interpretation of reality through the prism of his physical, social and cultural experience. Cognitive poetics is focused on the metaphorical aspects of thinking, due to which the conceptualization of human reality, based on physical and sensory-motor experiences, is possible, The reconstruction of the world fractal poetical model accentuates on the notion of poetry and poetic texts, on the reflection of reality, on esthetic aspect of poetry and on linguistic and communicative peculiarities of it.
The article is relevant in the aspect of modern polyparadigmatic research trends, because it is a synthesis and systematization of three linguistic paradigms (linguo-poetic, linguistic-cognitive and poetic-cognitive). These paradigms are focused on designing the fractal poetic model of the world as a construct. This construct embodies the deep meaning of poetic texts belonged to different cultural and historical periods. The mathematically-sociological and synergetic modeling are also have been taking into account. The aim and the results of investigation are determined by the specification of the poetical viewpoint embodied in the British poetry of romantic, modern and post-modern periods.Downloads
References
REFERENCES (TRANSLITERATED)
Bell, R. T. (1980) Sotsiolingvistika. Tseli, metodyi i problemyi. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyie otnosheniya. (in Russian)
Belousov, K. (2008) Sinergetika teksta: ot strukturyi k forme. Moscow: LIBROKOM. (in Russian)
Bieliekhova, L. (2004). Slovesnyi obraz v amerykanskii poezii: linhvokohnityvnyi aspekt. Kyiv: Ailant. (in Ukrainian)
Bystrov, Ya. (2016). Biohrafichnyi naratyv u linhvokohnityvnomu vymiri (na materiali anhlomovnoi prozy XX – pochatku XXI stolit). (Doctoral dissertation. Kyiv). (in Ukrainian)
Brokgauz, F. (2003). Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar. Sovremennaya versiya. Moscow: Eksmo. (in Russian)
Glazunova, O. (2012). Sinergetika tvorchestva: opyt analiza hudozhestvennogo teksta. Moscow: LIBROKOM. (in Russian)
Gurevich, P. (2019). Sovremennyiy gumanitarnyiy slovar-spravochnik. Moscow: Reabilitatsiya. (in Russian)
Dyakonova, N. (2001). Iz istorii angliyskoy literaturyi. Stati raznyih let. St-Petersburg: Alteyya. (in Russian)
Ilin, I. (2001). Postmodernizm. Slovar terminov. Moscow: INION RAN-INTRADA. (in Russian)
Karasik, V. (2013). Yazyikovaya matritsa kulturyi. Moscow: Gnozis. (in Russian)
Lakoff, G. (2004). Metaforyi, kotoryimi myi zhivyom. Moscow: URSS. (in Russian)
Lakoff, G. (2004a). Zhenschinyi, ogon i opasnyie veschi. Moscow: Yazyiki slavyanskoy kulturyi. (in Russian)
Marina, O. (2016). Paradoksalnist u suchasnomu anhlomovnomu poetychnomu dyskursi: kohnityvno-semiotychnyi vymir. (Doctoral dissertation. Kyiv). (in Ukrainian)
Karadzhe, T. (2012). Metodologiya modelirovaniya i prognozirovaniya sovremennogo mira. Moscow. (in Russian)
Moskalchuk, G. (2010). Struktura teksta kak sinergeticheskiy protsess. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (in Russian)
Moskvychova, O., & Suvorova T. (2017). Metamorfoza y obrazotvorennia: kohnityvno-semiotychni narysy. Kherson: Ailant. (in Ukrainian)
Nikonova, V. (2008). Kontseptualnyi prostir trahichnoho v p’iesakh Shekspira: poetyko-kohnityvnyi analiz (Doctoral dissertation. Dnipropetrovsk). (in Ukrainan)
Prykhodko, A. M. (2008). Kontsepty i kontseptosystemy v kohnityvno-dyskursyvnii paradyhmi linhvistyky. Zaporizhzhia: Premier. (in Ukranian)
Prosiannikova, Ya. M. (2017). Semiotychna pryroda khudozhnoho porivniannia. Kherson: Ailant. (in Ukrainian)
Reyngold, N. (2017). Modernizm v angliyskoy literature. Istoriya. Vzglyadyi. Programnyie esse. Moscow: Izdatelskiy tsentr Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanItarnogo universiteta. (in Russian)
Tolkovyiy anglo-russkiy slovar po nanotehnologii. (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://nanotech.academic.ru/fraktal. (in Russian)
Shilin, V. (2019). Slovar literaturovedcheskih terminov. Moscow: Kanon; Reabilitatsiya. (in Russian)
Yarova, N. (2003). Komparatyvni bloky u suchasnii amerykanskii poezii: linhvokohnityvnyi aspect (Doctoral dissertation. Kyyv). (in Ukrainian)
Kӧvecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kӧvecses, Z. (2004). Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2014). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).