Typology of metaphors in popular science media discourse (based on National Geographic resources)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2020.3.5Keywords:
conceptual metaphor, media discourse, source domain, target domain, slot, frameAbstract
The article deals with the analysis of conceptual metaphors in media discourse on the basis of English popular science texts. The material for the research includes texts from National Geographic resources (2016–2020), namely, from the National Geographic Magazine and Nat Geo Wild TV channel covering articles on history, environment, natural science, animal life and geography. The aim of the survey is to define the types of conceptual metaphors (after A. Chudinov) and to determine the dominant tendencies of their functioning. To achieve the aim, we used the conceptual analysis when determining conceptual models and their classification according to the types. Despite a somewhat indeterminate status of the popular science genre and its place in the structure of media or scientific discourse, scholars agree that such texts are characterized by a simplified presentation of scientific notions that should be easily understood by the audience which does not have the respective scientific background, as well as by the use of stylistic devices to make the text more expressive. In the survey, we have defined that all four types of metaphorical models are used in popular science media texts: anthropomorphous, nature-morphous, sociomorphous and artefact metaphors. Sociomorphous and artefact metaphors have been used most widely. By using sociomorphous metaphors, the authors of popular science texts compare natural phenomena with social relations between people. Namely, the behavior of animals or the functioning of plants is compared with military, sports or professional activity of people. The most prominent type was that of the artefact metaphors. By using such metaphors, authors draw parallels between how the animal world operates or how natural phenomena happen, and how more familiar artificial objects function. The most dominant in this group was the metaphor with the source domain “machine”, which is mapped on such spheres as “natural phenomenon”, “member of the animal world” etc. In addition to this source domain, artefact metaphors also included such concepts as clothes, building, food products. A relatively insignificant number of anthropomorphous and nature-morphous metaphors could be explained by the fact that in order to conceptualize natural phenomena, authors tend to use domains from noncontiguous spheres. The results of the article contribute to better understanding of how popular science texts function. Further research in this direction could be done in the examination of other lingual cognitive features of such texts, namely in researching how conceptual metonymies function here, as well as survey of other stylistically expressive means in these texts.
Downloads
References
Alzawaydeh, R. (2018). Analysing Discourse: The Case of Conceptual Metaphors in Football News Headlines in English and Arabic. International Journal of Linguistics, 10(6): 116. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v10i6.13502.
Baranova, I. (1995). Funktsionalnye osobennosti nauchno-populiarnykh tekstov: Na materiale podyazyka fiziki [Functional features of popular science texts: on the basis of physics sublanguage]. (PhD Dissertation, Moskow).
Bezsonova, A. (2016). Poniatie «nauchno-populiarnyi diskurs» v lingvisticheskoi literature [The notion of popular science discourse in scientific literature]. In Skhіdnoslovianska fіlologіia. Movoznavstvo. [Eastern Slavonic Philology. Linguistics], 29, 109–115.
Bilyk, O., Pyliachyk, N. (2018). Metaphorisation of BREXIT in modern political discourse. Advanced Education, 10, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.127267.
Bystrov, Y. (2016). Anhlomovnyy biohrafichnyy naratyv u vymirah kohnityvnoyi linhvistyky i synerhetyky [English biographical narrative in cognitive linguistics and synergy dimensions]. Kyiv, Ivano-Frankivsk.
Bystrov, Y. (2019). Metaforychna kontseptualizatsiya obraz-skhemy VHORI/VNYZU u deyktychnomu prostori biohrafichnoyi opovidi [Metaphoric conceptualization of the scheme UP/DOWN in deictic dimension of biographical narrative]. Lyudyno- i kulturoznavchi priorytety suchasnoho movoznavstva: napryamy, tendentsiyi ta mizhdystsyplinarna metodolohiya: kolektyvna monohrafiya [Anthropo- and culture-centric priorities of modern linguistics: trends, tendencies and interdisciplinary methodology: collective monograph]. (pp. 106–116). Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyy; Kremenchuk.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor. New York: Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706.
Chetverіkova, O. (2016). Komunіkatyvnі ta lіngvokulturolohіchnі peredumovy doslіdzhennia naukovo-populiarnoho tekstu [Communicative and lingual cultural conditions for the study of popular science text]. Naukoviy vіsnyk Іzmailskoho derzhavnoho humanіtarnoho unіversitetu [Journal of Ismail state humanities university]. Series «Philology», 35, 178–184.
Chudinov, A. (2001). Rossiia v metaforicheskom zerkale: kognitivnoe issledovanie politicheskoĭ metafory (1991–2000) [Russia in metaphoric mirror: cognitive research into political metaphor (1991–2000)]. Ekaterinburg.
Chudinov, A. (2013). Ocherki po sovremennoi politicheskoi metaforologii [Outline of modern political metaphor studies]. Ekaterinburg.
Dobrosklonskaia, T. (2006). Mediadiskurs kak obyekt lingvistiki i mezhkulturnoi kommunikatsii [Media discourse as the object of linguistics and intercultural communication]. In Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Moscow university journal], 10(2), 20–33.
Doychyk, O. (2013). Kontseptualna metafora v idiostyli Dzhuliana Barnsa: poetyko-kohnityvnyy analiz [Conceptual metaphor in Julian Barnes’ idiostyle]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriya: Romano-hermanska filolohiya. Metodyka vykladannya inozemnykh mov [Journal of Karazin national university of Kharkiv. Series: Romance and Germanic philology. Methods of foreign language teaching], 73, 32–37.
Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2020). https://www.britannica.com/topic/National-Geographic-Magazine.
Hart, C. (2017). Metaphor and Intertextuality in Media Framings of the (1984–1985) British Miners’ Strike: A Multimodal Analysis. Discourse & Communication, 11(1), pp. 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316683291.
Ishchenko, N., Lіpіnska, V. (2013). Leksiko-gramatychnі domіnanty naukovoho tekstu. [Lexical-grammatical dominants of scientific text] in Vіsnyk Natsіonalnoho tekhnіchnoho unіversitetu Ukrayiny [Journal of the National technical university of Ukraine], 1, 32–42
Kövecses, Z. (2018). Metaphor in media language and cognition: A perspective from conceptual metaphor theory. In: Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, 3(1), June 2018, https://doi.org/10.2478/lart-2018-0004.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, М. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MakKormak, E. (1990). Kognitivnaia teoriia metafory [Cognitive metaphor theory]. In ). Teoriia metafory [Metaphor theory]. (pp. 358–386). Moscow, Progress.
Musolff, A. (2012). The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9, 3, 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300.
Otaif, F. (2015). Metaphorical Framing of Media Discourse and the Representation of the Other: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis of Metaphors in the Press Discourse. King Khalid University Journal of Humanities, 24(3), 163–192.
Pіrog, І. (2019). Metafora u skladі argumentatsіi nіmetskoho medіadyskursu [Metaphor as argumentation in German media discourse] in Zakarpatskі fіlolohіchnі studіi [Transcarpathian philology studies], 2(2), 31–35.
Sabadash, D. (2015). Struktura terminokontseptu MEDICINE u svitli linhvokohnityvnykh doslidzhen [Structure of MEDICINE terminological concept in lingual cognitive research]. Odeskyy linhvistychnyy visnyk [Odessa linguistic journal], 5(1), 129–133.
Semyhina, T. (2001). Vykorystannya dyskurs-analizu v doslidzhennyakh iz sotsialnoyi roboty [The use of discourse analysis in social work research]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA [NKMU scholarly articles], 19(2), 322–325.
Simpson. P. (2004). Stylistics. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496589.
Velykoroda, Y. (2012). Pretsedentni fenomeny v amerykanskomu mediynomu dyskursi (na materiali chasopysiv “Time” ta “Newsweek”) [Precedent-related phenomena in American media discourse (on the basis of “Time” and “Newsweek” magazines)]. (Dissertation, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv).
Velykoroda, Y. (2019). Conceptual Metaphorisation through Precedent-Related Phenomena in Media Discourse. Studies about Languages, 34, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.34.22088.
Vorobyova, O. (2010). Metafory pro metafory: dydaktychniy scenariy. [Metaphors about metaphors: didactic scenario]. Zapysky z romano-hermanskoyi filolohiyi. [Romance and Germanic philology proceedings], 25, 76–83.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
