Silence and speech of the colonial subject in the prose of H. Kvitka-Osnovianenko
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2025.1.1Keywords:
didactic discourse, ideology, idyll, genre, criticism, character, prose, enlightenment storyAbstract
The article examines the opposition of silence and speech in the stories by H. Kvitka-Osnovianenko “Do well — it will be well” and “Kozyr-divka”. These texts are very indicative in how they embody the position of a colonial person who chooses between imperial loyalty, unconditional submission to power, and suppressed or open resistance. The purpose of the study is related to the need for a thorough analysis of the means of presenting the position of the conquered through verbal and non-verbal communication. The research uses postcolonial theory, which allows us to understand the ambivalence of the artistic thinking of the founder of Ukrainian prose, his imitation of the traditions of educational and Christian humanism with a tangible critical approach to covering life realities. Understanding the artistry of Kvitka-Osnovianenko is facilitated by introducing elements of text deconstruction, a thorough study of speech genres, and the correlation of verbal and non-verbal methods of communication. The emphasis is on the importance of literary anthropology as a method that allows us to see manifestations of human behavior, temperament, gender identity, and socio-historical characteristics in the elements of speech. In the anthropological dimension, several archaic genres are presented, with which the corresponding types of statements are correlated, illustrating complete harmony or expressive protest, and sharp criticism of the repressive bureaucratic apparatus. This is the novelty of the study. The author first analyzes Kvitka-Osnovianenko’s stories from the point of view of rhetorical strategies and their close interaction with the genre and psychology of the colonial subject. It is demonstrated that these texts have the potential for a much deeper reading, which is not limited only to the ethnographic context.
The results of the study indicate the development of figures of speech, counter-discourse within the conservative ideology of the writer, and the search for new ways of describing reality in Ukrainian prose of the first half of the 19th century. The role of anthropological factors in the reception of Kvitka-Osnovianenko’s works in the postcolonial dimension is proven. The study allows us to formulate further prospects for the study of Ukrainian classics from the point of view of rhetorical strategies.
Downloads
References
Barthes, R. (1984). La division des langages. In Le bruissement de la langue (pp. 113–126). Seuil.
Budnyi, V., & Ilnytskyi, M. (2008). Porivnialne literaturoznavstvo [Comparative Literature]. VD “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia”.
Donchyk, V. (Ed.) (2016). Istoriia ukrainskoi literatury u 12 t. T. 3. Literatura XIX stolittia (1800–1830) [History of Ukrainian Literature in 12 volumes. Vol. 3. Literature of the 19th century (1800–1830)]. Naukova dumka.
Foucault, M. (2016). Discours et vérité précédé de La parresia. Vrin.
Hnatiuk, O. (2005). Proshchannia z imperiieiu. Ukrainski dyskusii pro identychnist [Farewell to Empire. Ukrainian Debates on Identity]. Krytyka.
Isichenko, I. (2008). “Bozhestvenne movchannia” y rytoryka asketychnoho tekstu [“Divine silence” and the rhetoric of the ascetic text]. In Sacrum i Bibliia v ukrainskii literaturi (pp. 93–100). Ingvarr.
Kolessa, O. (1927). Geneza ukrainskoi novitnoi povisty [The genesis of the modern Ukrainian short story]. Derzhavna drukarnia u Prazi.
Kvitka-Osnovianenko, H. (1981). Zibrannia tvoriv u 7 t. Vol. 3 [Collected works in 7 vol. Vol. 3]. Naukova dumka.
Plutarkh (2023). Porivnialni zhyttiepysy. T. 1 [Comparative biographies. Vol. 1]. Stylet i Stylos.
Shamrai, A. (1930). Kharkivska shkola romantykiv. T. 1 [Kharkiv School of Romantic. Vol. 1]. Derzhavne vydavnytstvo Ukrainy.
Sherekh, Yu. (1952). Etiudy pro natsionalne v literaturakh suchasnosty. Do teorii natsionalno-orhanichnykh styliv [Studies on the National in Contemporary Literatures. Towards a Theory of National-Organic Styles]. Literaturno-naukovyi zbirny, 1, 148–161.
Shkandrii, M. (2004). V obiimakh imperii: Rosiiska i ukrainska literatury novitnoi doby [In the arms of the empire: Russian and Ukrainian literature of the modern era]. Fakt.
Shovalter, (1996). Feministychna krytyka u pushchi [Feminist criticism in the wilderness]. In M. Zubrytska (Ed.), Antolohiia svitovoi literaturno-krytychnoi dumky XX st. (pp. 510–530). Litopys.
Spivak, G. Ch. (1996). Chy mozhe pidporiadkovane promovliaty? [Can a subordinate speak?]. In M. Zubrytska (Ed.), Antolohiia svitovoi literaturno-krytychnoi dumky XX st. (pp. 540–543). Litopys.
Sulyma-Blokhyn[a], O. (1969). Kvitka i Kulish — osnovopolozhnyky ukrainskoi novely [Kvitka and Kulish — the founders of the Ukrainian short story] [Special issue]. Naukovi zapysky. Ukrainskyi Tekhnichno-Hospodarskyi Instytut, 15.
Zabuzhko, O. (2009). Zhinka-avtor u kolonialnii kulturi, abo Znadoby do ukrainskoi gendernoi mifolohii [The female author in colonial culture, or The need for Ukrainian gender mythology]. In O. Zabuzhko, Khroniky vid Fortynbrasa. Vybrana eseistyka (pp. 152–191). Fakt.
Zerov, M. (2007). Ukrainske pysmenstvo XIX st. Vid Kulisha do Vynnychenka [Ukrainian literature of the 19th century. From Kulish to Vynnychenko]. Vidrodzhennia.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Artur Malynovskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
